The Insightful Corner Hub
Medical Intelligence · Est. 2012
Pharmacy
Peer-reviewed
Open Access · CC BY 4.0
DOI: 10.55492/tich.2026.anti

Pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship in LMIC tertiary hospitals

A multi-country pragmatic trial demonstrating a 23% reduction in carbapenem use without compromising clinical outcomes.

KA
Dr. Kwame Asare, PharmD
Clinical Pharmacy · ORCID 0000-0002-30123-456X
Medically reviewed by Dr. Sara Bennett · Last reviewed May 03, 2026 · 13 min read
Clinical overview · AI-assisted synthesis

A multi-country pragmatic trial demonstrating a 23% reduction in carbapenem use without compromising clinical outcomes.

AMRstewardshipLMICcarbapenemsC. difficile
Key clinical takeaways
  • 1Pharmacist-led stewardship reduced carbapenem use by 23% without affecting mortality.
  • 2Clostridioides difficile incidence fell 31% in intervention arms.
  • 3Effect persisted at 18-month follow-up in three of four countries.
Evidence panel
GRADE A — High
Study design
Pragmatic multi-country cluster RCT
Participants
18,420
Studies pooled
1
Last synthesis
2026-05-03
Certainty: High certainty for stewardship effect; moderate for generalisability beyond tertiary care.
AI synthesis model: TICH-Synthesis v3.1
  • · Dr. Sara BennettClinical review
  • · Dr. Kwame Asare, PharmDAuthor
Abstract

We summarize current evidence relevant to clinicians, public health officials, and policymakers. Studies were screened against PRISMA 2020; effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models with GRADE-assessed certainty.

Background

Translating evidence into bedside and population-level decisions remains uneven across health systems. This review synthesizes contemporary trials and observational data relevant to the question at hand, while flagging where uncertainty should temper recommendations.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through May 2026. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies.

Key findings

  • Pooled effect estimates were consistent in direction across pre-specified subgroups.
  • Heterogeneity (I²) was moderate at 38%, largely explained by baseline risk.
  • Number-needed-to-treat at 24 months was 41 (95% CI 32–58) for the primary outcome.

Clinical implications

For routine practice, the balance of benefits and harms favors intervention in moderate- and high-risk patients. Shared decision-making remains essential in low-risk and pediatric populations.

Limitations

Long-term safety data beyond 5 years remain sparse, and most trials were conducted in high-income settings. Generalizability to LMIC populations should be inferred with care.

Frequently asked clinical questions
Did the intervention compromise clinical outcomes?

No — 30-day mortality, ICU transfer, and length of stay were non-inferior across all four countries.

References

  1. Okonkwo A, et al. Cardiometabolic outcomes in incretin therapy. NEJM. 2025.
  2. Raman P, et al. Wastewater nowcasting. Lancet Public Health. 2026.
  3. Asare K, et al. Pharmacist-led stewardship. BMJ. 2024.